Peruvian (southern) - Chilean (northern) Anchovy
Fishery Improvement Project
Last Update: April 2013
Species: anchoveta (Engraulis ringens)
FIP Scope/Scale: Stock level
Fishery Location: Chile, Peru, for map see Anchoveta - Chilean regions xv-i-ii / Southern Peruvian stock
FIP Contact:
If you would like more information about the FIP or wish to support the FIP, please contact SFP.
FIP Participants:
SFP is currently seeking industry participants
Other FIP Partners/Stakeholders:
Universities of Iquique and Tacna
IMARPE-Ilo (Marine Research Institute of Peru)
PRODUCE (Peru´s Ministry of Production)
SUBPESCA (Chile´s Fisheries Authority)
IFOP (Chilean Fisheries Research Institute)
Sustainability Information:
See Summary and Sustainability Info tab in Anchoveta - Chilean regions xv-i-ii / Southern Peruvian stock
Date Publicly Announced: 2008
FIP Stage: 4, FIP is delivering improvement in policies or practices
Current Improvement Recommendations:
- Implement coordination of research and management between Peru and Chile; define limit and target reference points and a recovery plan in both countries
- Improve the robustness of fisheries science common approach
- Establish limits for anchovy harvest by the Peruvian artisanal fleet and strict controls to avoid deviation from direct human consumption to fishmeal factories
- Enforce the 5-mile exclusion zone for the industrial fleet in both countries as a precautionary approach, while scientific and consensual research demonstrates possibilities for another less precautionary approach
Background:
This shared fishery fluctuated the last 10 years between 1 and 2.5 million tonnes landed annually, with approximately the landings divided approximately evenly between the twoa half million tonnes for each countriesy ((iIn 2011 and 2012, Chile accounted for 64% and Peru 36%). The anchovy is the key piece of the trophic chain within the Southeastern Pacific ecosystem, an environment extremely variable under the influence of the Peruvian (Humboldt) current, Cromwell current, and periodic strong El Nino and La Nina events.
Recent scientific reports showed a concerning trend in biomass and recruitment between 2004 and 2009; however, the trend seems to have reversed since 2010, apparently due to 60% reduction in fishing mortality. Management measures are not coordinated by both countries, though some mechanisms are in place, for example, joint annual technical meetings for exchange of data. Despite having some common initiatives, such as the CPPS (South Pacific Permanent Commission) and the Humboldt Current GEF project, the boundary conflict has stalled further progress on coordination between Peru and Chile.
On the Peruvian side, both the lack of transparency with regard to science and conflicts between industrial and artisanal fisheries have been major problems. However, in 2012 new rules were created to get the industrial fleet out of the coastal zone. On the Chilean side, scientific work has been more transparent, but the stock assessment model does not seems robust enough and estimates vary sharply from year to year. According with the last Chilean stock assessment, biomass increased since 2010, after a period of decline, but the status of the stock is still within the overfishing zone (reproductive potential ratio at 45%, while 30% is considered a limit and 60% a target), so a recovery plan would be needed.
The impacts of these fisheries on the trophic chain are not well known yet. Bycatch impacts are important but not well studied, which is of particular importance given that this fishery has been driven very close to the coastline, creating conflict with artisanal fishers in both countries.
SFP is working with its major buyer and supplier partners to support improvement efforts. SFP’s focus in the field has been on supporting CeDePesca, who has run a series of technical workshops and dialogues on the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.
CeDePesca is in dialogue with local players in the artisanal and industrial sector to encourage further improvements. In June 2011, CeDePesca conducted the first Bilateral Workshop on ERAEF (Ecological Risk Assessment for the Effect of Fishing) applied to the anchovy fishery located in southern Peru and northern Chile. The workshop was held in Tacna (Peru) and Arica (Chile), with participants including Peruvian artisanal fishermen, scientific staff from TASA, IMARPE researchers, CORPESCA representatives, and university academics from Chile and Peru.
The workshop participants agreed that the key issues in this fishery, among others, were:
- The three southern Peru regions involved in this fishery have ceased to allow industrial boats into the artisanal protection zone (waters from 0 to 5 miles off the coast).
- In the south of Peru, illegal and unreported fishing by so-called artisanal boats (in fact, small-scale purse-seiners) is a main issue because their harvest is illegally diverted to fishmeal factories.
- In the north of Chile, there is bycatch of juvenile Chilean jack mackerel that seems to go unreported.
- More effort should be made to get information on populations of guano bird “Guanay,” green turtles, and the Burmeister porpoise as emblematic, vulnerable species representing the ecosystem impacted directly and indirectly by the anchovy fishery.
- There is a lack of coordination between Chilean and Peruvian fisheries authorities.
Since the workshop, issue #1 has been reinforced by a Supreme Decree from the Peruvian national government and issue #3 has been addressed by Chilean authorities.
FIP Objectives:
- Improve the robustness of fisheries science common approach
- Implement coordinated management measures following scientific recommendations
- Establish limits for anchovy harvest by the Peruvian artisanal fleet and strict controls to avoid deviation from direct human consumption to fishmeal factories
- Enforce the 5-mile exclusion zone for the industrial fleet in both countries as a precautionary approach while scientific and consensual research demonstrates possibilities for another less precautionary approach
- Coordinate efforts to understand direct and indirect impacts on the components of the ecosystem and manage them adequately.
Progress Update:
2009
- Since the second half of 2009, TACs have been established in Peru for the first time, together with an IQ system.
2010
- Since June 2010, effort limit has been established in Peru in regard to the artisanal fleet.
2011
- In October 2011, the Peruvian government abrogated the rule that allowed the industrial fleet to penetrate into the artisanal 5-mile zone.
- In the second half of 2011, Moquegua Region authorities abrogated the so-called “Regional Food Support Program” (in Spanish, PAAR). Under this umbrella, some small-scale purse-seiners deviated anchovy harvests from direct human consumption to fishmeal factories, violating specific rules about that.
- A GEF project encouraged by the UNDP and involving both governments (Humboldt Current Project) includes joint research and coordinated management for this stock of anchovy as one of the main goals to be achieved. This is coincident with one of the key FIP objectives.
2012
January – June
- While Peru set a 400,000-tonne TAC for the first semester of 2012, Chile established a year-round TAC of 800,000 tonnes. These TACs did not seem to be aligned with a recovery goal.
- From January to June 2012, in the southern region of Peru, 300,000 tonnes of anchovy were landed, 20% less than during the same period in 2011. The incidence of juveniles in the catches was 3-4% (according to IMARPE´s report).
July – September
- Following the recommendation of IMARPE, in July 2012 PRODUCE established a TAC of 307,000 tonnes for the second season of 2012 (August-December).
- In August 2012, PRODUCE established the criterion for categorizing fishing vessels in the anchovy fishery directed at human consumption, designating those vessels as either artisanal or smaller-scale. In addition, PRODUCE determines reserve areas for the activities of the artisanal and small-scale fleets.
October – December
- In November 2012, the assessment survey conducted by IMARPE revealed an anchovy biomass in the southern region around 2 million tonnes, and recommended a TAC between 400 thousand and 450 thousand tonnes, including all kinds of fishing fleets. For Chile, the estimation was 2.3 million tonnes and the TAC was 800 thousand tonnes.
- At the same time, CeDePesca sent to PRODUCE and made public a statement about the anchovy fishery, which analyzes the state of the anchovy population reported by IMARPE, the official information of anchovy catches, production and commercialization of fishmeal in the last 5 years, and the potential extraction of the smaller-scale fleet that would operate under the Supreme Decree 005-2012-PRODUCE. The statement also included, among others, fishery management recommendations aimed at discouraging discards in fishing operations, improving the on-board observer program, accelerating the closure of marine areas with a high presence of juvenile specimens, and setting a limit of allowable catch and ITQ system for artisanal and smaller-scale fleets (14 November 14 2012).
- In December 2012, PRODUCE established the Supreme Decree 008-2012-PRODUCE, which introduces some improvements in fisheries management, some of which were recommendations made by CeDePesca on the statement of anchovy fishery delivered in November.
- From January to December 2012, in the southern region of Peru, 357,000 tonnes of anchovy were landed, 50% less than during the same period in 2011. In Chile, 2012 landings accounted for 650 thousand tonnes, 37% less than for 2011.
- Following the recommendation of IMARPE, in December 2012 PRODUCE established a TAC of 400,000 tonnes for the first season of 2013 (January–June). This fishing quota is applicable only to the larger-scale fleet, the industrial fleet. In Chile, the National Fisheries Council established a TAC of 800,000 tonnes, following the recommendation of SUBPESCA.
2013
January – March
- No recent substantive developments to report.
- Efforts to encourage industry participation continue.
Click here for a comprehensive description of FIP results