baltic cod

fishery improvement partnership

We identified the following problems in this fishery, again based on data from ICES:

Our analysis points to the following possible next steps:

  1. Check the science behind the EU plan. ICES should assess whether the proposed harvest reduction is sufficiently precautionary or likely to recover the stock.
  2. Set a sensible TAC. ICES scientists have recommended a moratorium. If the EU chooses to allow fishing, it should be precautionary and based on a credible scientific assessment.
  3. Improve the estimate of illegal landings to provide a more solid and widely accepted basis for addressing the problem. This requires transparent disclosure of methods of estimation, as in the Barents Sea.
  4. Combat illegal fishing. If high levels of poaching are confirmed in parts of the fishery, then seafood companies should push for stronger monitoring, control, surveillance and enforcement. They also should develop private-sector measures to verify the legality of the products they supply or purchase.

November 2007 Update

Stock of Baltic cod is at low levels and a formal recovery plan has been implemented by the European Union. Illegal fishing is the key remaining obstacle to sustainability. SFP joined Esperen and Young’s at the Baltic Regional Advisory Council meeting in March, 2007, when both companies gave strong messages against illegal fishing. Their support helped secure ministerial commitments which lead to EU audits of the fishery and a requirement to stop Polish fishing. Unfortunately, rather than work to identify a sustainable solution for their fishermen, the Polish government disagreed with the numbers and refused to close the fishery.

More information: